ALPHA ENGINEERINGPower & Energy · Since 1979
Both are reasonable positions. These are the situations GMs and operations leaders describe to us when only one of them has been in the room, and we're usually brought in to hold both.
The same section of line goes down every time the wind picks up. The crew splices it, the lights come back on, and the cycle repeats next storm. Eventually that becomes routine: expected outage, expected overtime, expected fix.
A practiced response is not the same thing as a diagnosed cause. The SAIDI and SAIFI numbers your team already reports usually point straight at it, once someone reads that data as a pattern on one circuit instead of a series of unrelated events.
Where this adds up: overtime that has become routine, and members who have stopped expecting better.A substation built without two spare positions. Conductor sized to this year's peak. Both look entirely reasonable in the meeting where they're approved, and both have to keep performing for the next five decades. The tension between what operations needs this winter and what the system needs in 2050 is real, and it resolves in favor of this winter almost every time.
That trade-off is rarely made on purpose. Far more often, nobody in the room framed it as a fifty-year decision at the moment it was being made.
Where this adds up: capacity you'll have to retrofit at far greater expense than building it in would have cost.One person knows where everything is, why it was built that way, and which workarounds are load-bearing. None of it was written down, because there was never a quarter where writing it down was the most urgent thing. Now there's a retirement date on the calendar.
System knowledge held in one person's head is a single point of failure, the same as any other. It just fails quietly, months after the person who held it has already gone.
Where this adds up: institutional knowledge that walks out the door the day it would matter most.A transformer, a recloser, a piece of switchgear gets ordered to keep the project moving, on a spec that was close enough, before anyone with an engineering background checked whether it fit the system it was going into.
Sometimes it works out. Sometimes it arrives exactly as ordered, won't coordinate with what's already in the field, and can't easily be resold because of how specialized it is. Catching that before the purchase order costs a fraction of what it costs afterward, and specialty gear can take a year or more to replace.
Where this adds up: rework, delays, and equipment that doesn't fit the system it was bought for.Budget is tight every year, and maintenance that hasn't caused a visible problem yet is the easiest line to move. That's a defensible decision to make once. It's a different decision the fifth year running on the same piece of equipment.
Deferred maintenance doesn't go away. It accumulates into a failure that arrives on its own schedule, at a moment you don't choose, at a cost well beyond the maintenance that would have prevented it.
Where this adds up: a failure that's getting closer every year it's deferred, and getting more expensive the longer it waits.Not quite your situation? Tell us what's going on and we'll be straight with you about whether engineering is the gap.
Let's Talk →