Line Design

We design line for the load it needs to carry over its service life.

Conductor gets sized once and then lives with that decision for forty years. Size it to today's load and the rebuild comes back as a capital project, usually at a worse time and a worse price. Size it against a growth curve nobody checked and you have paid for capacity that never shows up. We model the growth first and build the structures, sag and tension around it, for transmission, distribution and fiber. Staking sheets come out of AlphaStake, which we wrote ourselves, but if your crews already work in Futura, Partner or MapWise we will work in yours so the packets look the way your people expect.

When the load grows, you already have the capacity in the ground and you are not paying to rebuild the same mile of line.
Choosing an approach

How conductor size is determined.

Match Existing Conductor Nearby

Size the new line to match nearby comparable lines. Easy to justify, but that conductor was sized for its load history, not this line's future.

Defensible when this segment's load profile really does match the lines you're comparing against.
Size to Today's Peak Load

Size to current peak with little margin. Lowest cost now, but no room for the growth or interconnections likely over the line's life.

Fine on a segment where load is flat and likely to stay that way.
Engineering-Led Sizing

Terrain, sag-tension, and load growth modeling size the conductor and structures for the load the line will actually carry over its lifespan.

What you want when the line has to carry growing or changing load for forty years.
How we help

What the finished design package includes.

All of it is built to be handed to a crew or a contractor and worked from without a phone call back to the office.

01
Load Growth Projection Conductor sized against where load on this segment is actually headed. We show the growth assumptions rather than burying them, so you can argue with them before the wire is on order.
02
3D Terrain & Sag-Tension Modeling PLS-CADD modeling that accounts for your actual terrain, not generic assumptions about clearance and tension.
03
Right-of-Way & Clearance Engineering Structure placement and clearances worked against NESC requirements for the loading district you're actually in, with the ice and wind cases run rather than assumed.
04
Construction-Ready Design Package Staking sheets, plan and profile, structure lists, and a bill of material your crews can build from without calling the office. In AlphaStake by default, or in Futura, Partner, or MapWise if that's what your people already use.
Engineering Review

Send us the route and what you expect it to carry.

We review what you send and follow up about what the sizing decision hinges on, before anyone stakes anything.

Request an Engineering Review →

You speak directly with an engineer about your situation and the next step.

  1. 1You send what you have
  2. 2An engineer runs the sizing question
  3. 3We call you before anything gets staked
This site uses cookies and similar technology to understand how visitors engage with our content, including identifying the companies that visit. Contact us at info@alphaeng.us with any questions about how this data is used.